Thursday, June 23, 2016

Filters


  Air filters. Furnace filters. Water filters. Pool filters. Internet filters. Even sunglasses are a type of filter. Filters ensure that what’s on the receiving end has had the impurities removed. Clean air. Clean water. Pornographic sites blocked. Filters remove the junk we don’t want to breathe, drink, smell, or see. They’re useful devices.
  Every human has a built-in filter. You may have heard of them, although you won’t read about these filters in any medical journal. I’m referring to the filter between the brain and the mouth. Like most useful filters, it wears out over time and should be replaced, although no replacement has ever been manufactured through conventional means. I’ve come to the conclusion that human filters wear out around age sixty, and that some people were never born with a filter -- including members of my own family. There are a few exceptional individuals who maintain their filters their entire lives. We all know a sweet old grandma or grandpa who has a kind word for everyone, but nowadays they seem to be the exception to the filtration rule.
  Why is a brain-to-mouth filter so important? There’s this remarkable thing called tact. It goes a long way in preserving happy marriages, self-esteem, lasting friendships, confident children, solid business partnerships, and is the key to good public relations in any setting. Some individuals who lack the tact filter may confuse their words with candor or honesty, but those on the receiving end will correctly identify it as verbal abuse. There’s nothing constructive about constructive criticism.   The tact filter should be utilized in our interactions with our fellow humans, especially members of our own families.
  On the flip side, there are a few things that shouldn’t be filtered. The news, for instance. Although freedom of the press falls under the same Amendment to the Constitution as freedom of speech, the media has taken it upon itself to filter what we see and hear on the news. Their agenda makes it difficult to glean truth from fiction so we can make informed decisions. The media doesn’t have the right to cherry-pick or fabricate ‘facts’ to force us what to think or who to vote for.  This type of selective filtering is unhealthy for our nation.
  And then we have way too many people who believe we shouldn’t be able to exercise freedom of speech if it’s not what they want to hear, if what we say is contrary to their ideology of a secular utopian society where everything is ‘fair’ and ‘free’. See the irony here? It’s only ‘fair’ and ‘free’ if it falls under their limited view of what ‘fair’ and ‘free’ is. Don’t like what you hear or read? Guess what -- you have the right to apply your ear filters and ignore it. You do not have the right to silence another voice because you don’t want to bother to find your ear filters. College students need a ‘safe space’-- give me a break.
  My point is that filters are wonderful things when used appropriately and replaced when they wear out. On a large scale, selective filtering isn’t a good thing, especially when it comes to the media pushing a liberal agenda and efforts to silence the opinions of others. On a personal scale, filters are crucial. Check your tact filter the next time you open your mouth to offer ‘constructive’ criticism to your spouse, child, friend, parent, or other important person in your life. When used regularly, I believe the tact filter can be maintained well into old age. Something to consider until science invents a replacement.

 

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

On Zombies and Shakespeare



  So I don't get the recent fascination with zombies.  Apocalyptic books and movies seem to be the go-to genre for the masses. I get that people like horror and the thrill of a heart-pounding adventure, but I'll be the first to admit that I'm not into the blood and gore. And there is a lot of blood and gore, death and dismemberment in this genre. It's like Hollywood is having a contest to see how many people they can gross out. Face it, most dystopian fiction is grim. Everyone is serious because they're fighting for their lives, and are just relieved if they don't die in some gruesome way. I don't get it. What's so entertaining about death on a mass scale? Unless it's Orcs, of course, but that's a different genre.
  Over the past month, I've (reluctantly) watched some popular dystopian movies with my family. Mockingjay Part 2, The Scorch Trials, Insurgent. Grim stuff. The hero never smiles -- did you notice? Everyone looks serious All. The. Time. Even when the good guys win (hello, Katniss), the ending is sad because the death toll is staggering.
  I admit that my own books are categorized under dystopian, but my apocalyptic details are mentioned only in passing. World War III (whatever, pick a number) isn't the point of the story. The point is how people learn to thrive and find happiness in the aftermath. I think a little hope goes a long way, and I use it. In college, Shakespeare's tragedies was one of my favorite courses. Macbeth with his bloody knife was a forerunner of The Walking Dead. Grim stuff, but Shakespeare used one brilliant strategy in his tragedies: comic relief. He always added a few chuckles in with the death and dismemberment. I think this is why his work is still popular in our day.
  This is totally my opinion (hey, it's my blog) but I would predict that zombies are a fad. The gross-out factor will get old after a while and ride off into the sunset along with disco and pet rocks. People want to feel good when they finish a book or leave the theater. Do I want to pay $10 to watch the earth be destroyed? Um, no. I think I'll see something funny instead. This is why movies like Star Wars have remained popular for decades: humor. Yes, I know Star Wars isn't dystopian (episodes 1-3 aren't even watchable without a barf bag) but you get my point.
  Give those zombies a sense of humor, and then they'll truly live forever.